Key Highlights:
- Anthropic’s new Interviewer tool interviewed 1,250 professionals to understand how AI influences productivity, job identity, and day-to-day workflows across different sectors.
- The study found that workers see AI as a major time-saver but also expressed concerns about career impact, workplace stigma, and the need for stronger human oversight.
- Creative professionals and scientists reportedly hinted at faster output and research support from AI. However, they suggested to remain cautious due to issues, hallucinations, and fears of economic displacement.
If you have ever wondered how people really use AI at work, Anthropic may finally have an answer to that. Today the AI company has unveiled Anthropic Interviewer tool. And yes, it does work as the name suggests. It can conduct large-scale interviews to understand professionals’ perspective on AI. Anthropic says that this AI tool is built on Claude that runs detailed conversations automatically and feeds the results to human researchers for analysis.
What the Anthropic Interviewer study reveals about AI at workplace
In the initial early testing, Anthropic Interviewer interviewed 1,250 professionals, which included 1,000 general workforce, 125 creative professionals, and 125 scientists. Anthropic says that the goal is to understand how AI affects productivity, personal professional identity, and future work. They believe every participant in the test had consented that their data can be analyzed and publicly released.
Now, you must be wondering what the Anthropic Interviewer’s test results revealed. Well, among the general workforce, AI is largely seen as a productivity booster. 86% of the participants from the test reported that AI helps them save time, while 65% said that they are satisfied with it. However, there is also a concern among the general workforce regarding its impact on future careers.
Apparently, 55% of those who sat in the interview expressed anxiety for the same matter. Professionals meanwhile have reported navigating AI stigma at work as mentioned in the announcement post. One fact-checker had said that they avoid sharing AI use with their colleagues. Meanwhile, a pastor highlighted the need for good boundaries to prevent over-dependence on AI. Overall, many see AI as augmenting work, especially the routine administrative tasks. That being said, human oversight remains crucial.
You may also like to read: Meta Scores Major Coup, Poaches Apple’s Alan DyeThe three stages of Anthropic Interviewer
What creative professionals and scientists think about AI’s role
When it comes to creative professionals, they say that AI speeds up their workflows, with 97% saying that AI saves them time, while 68% admitted that it improves work quality. When I say creative professionals, here I am referring to novelists, photographers, and web content creators who, according to Anthropic, reported significantly higher output and faster turnaround with the use of AI. However, many creative professionals worry that they might be judged because they use AI and the potential economic displacement related to it.
When it comes to research, scientists taking part in the interviews show clear interest in AI assistance, especially when it comes to hypothesis generation and experimental design. They also admit that the current AI use is limited to tasks like manuscript writing and debugging. The test also reveals that scientists don’t have enough confidence in AI at this point because of the fact that it hallucinates. Nearly half of the respondents feel AI should augment rather than fully automate tasks.
Summing up, the Anthropic Interviewer study reveals that AI is reshaping work while also concluding that although AI increases efficiency and output, it raises questions about job identity, ethics, and trust. And with tools like Anthropic Interviewer, companies and researchers can better understand both the opportunities and challenges of a workplace where AI is gradually taking over.
